Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:34

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Odit dolor officiis cupiditate doloribus repellendus culpa ullam.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Major supermarket chain workers start strike across 4 cities - TheStreet
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
GM has another affordable EV in the works and it’s not the next-gen Chevy Bolt - Electrek
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Has anyone ever participated in a gang bang and what was it like?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How do you know if your husband loves you truly and deeply?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.